Monday, April 25, 2011

Cannulated Screw Fixation of Jones Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: A Comparison of Titanium and Stainless Steel Screw Fixation

J. George DeVries, DPM, AACFAS 1, Daniel J. Cuttica, DO 2, Christopher F. Hyer, DPM, FACFAS 3


The classic Jones fracture involves the fifth metatarsal at the level of the proximal diaphyseal-metaphyseal junction. The mainstay of surgical treatment for the Jones fracture is intramedullary screw fixation. There is no consensus of the type or material of screw that should be used. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to test the hypothesis that there is no clinical difference in the incidence of healing, or complica- tions, when comparing stainless steel to titanium cannulated screws used in Jones fracture open-reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Data were collected on a total of 53 patients (fractures) that were fixed with either cannulated titanium screws (Ti group) or cannulated stainless steel screws (SS group). The postoperative protocol was standardized. The mean time to radiographic union was 11.7 ` 5.1 weeks in the Ti group and 13.4 ` 5.7 weeks in the SS group (P 1⁄4 .333). The overall union rate for the Ti group was 36/37 (97%) and 14/16 (88%) in the SS group (P 1⁄4 .213). Complications were rare in both groups, and the prevalence was not statistically significantly different (P > .05). There was 1 patient with an asymptomatic radiographic nonunion in the Ti group, and this patient elected not to undergo revision. There were 2 nonunions in the SS group. One was revised and went on to heal and the other is awaiting revision. Our study has demonstrated the decision to use stainless steel or titanium can be left to patient constraints, such as allergies, or physician preference without compromising the clinical result.

Level of Clinical Evidence:
Keywords: biomechanics injury ORIF nonunion surgery trauma

1 Staff Surgical Podiatrist, Ripon Medical Center, Ripon, WI 
2 Orthopaedic Surgeon, Center for Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 
3 Fellowship Co-director, Advanced Foot and Ankle Surgery Fellowship, Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center, Westerville, OH

Monday, April 18, 2011

Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes after Treatment of Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures Using Delta-Frame External Fixator Construct

Charles G. Kissel, DPM, FACFAS 1, Zeeshan S. Husain, DPM, FACFAS 2, James M. Cottom, DPM, FACFAS 3Ryan T. Scott, DPM 4, Joshua Vest, DPM 5

Intra-articular calcaneal fractures are associated with high morbidity, persistent pain, and long-term disability. This retrospective study assesses early clinical and radiographic postoperative findings of intra-articular calcaneal fractures following treatment by ligamentotaxis using a delta frame construct with a large frag- ment external fixator. Minimally invasive percutaneous reduction of calcaneal fractures is an alternative treatment for Sanders type II, III, and IV fractures. Ten patients from the Detroit Medical Center were followed between January 2002 and December 2004 for follow-up over a mean of 353.5 ` 85.45 days postoperatively. The mean age of the patients was 45.8 ` 12.3 years. There were 2 patients with Sanders type IIA, 3 patients with type IIIAB, 1 patient with type IIIAC, and 4 patients with type IV fracture patterns. The results demon- strated that the mean calcaneal width decreased, the calcaneal height increased, and the calcaneal length increased when comparing preoperative to postoperative measurements. Bohlers angle increased from 20.8 ` 8.27 preoperatively to 25.7 ` 5.21 postoperatively, and Gissanes angle decreased from 127.4 ` 45.22 preoperatively to 111.2 ` 39.38 postoperatively. The posterior facet step-off on CT examination reduced from 2.6 ` 0.82 mm preoperatively to 0.4 ` 0.26 mm postoperatively. The mean postoperative total subtalar joint range of motion was 19.0 ` 4.5 on the affected side and 34.4 ` 4.58 on the contralateral foot. The mean Maryland Foot score was 85.8 ` 6.41 in the 10 patients. With the exception of the change from preoperative to postoperative Bohlers angle, and the comparison of the ipsilateral (side of the fracture) to contralateral resting calcaneal stance position, all of the comparisons revealed statistically significant (P .05) differences. The authors conclude that the delta frame construct is a viable alternative method to open reduction and internal fixation for treating intra-articular calcaneal fractures.



Level of Clinical Evidence:
Keywords: distraction frame heel ligamentotaxis trauma


1 Detroit Medical Center PM&S-36 Residency Program Director, Detroit, MI 
2 Detroit Medical Center PM&S-36 Assistant Residency Director, Detroit, MI 
3 Submitted during residency, Detroit Medical Center PM&S-36, Detroit, MI 
4 Submitted during residency, Detroit Medical Center PM&S-36, Detroit, MI 
5 Submitted during residency, Detroit Medical Center PM&S-36, Detroit, MI

Monday, April 11, 2011

Medial Column Rodding Facilitated by Transitional Osteochondral Graft

Jeremy Cook, DPM, MPH, Emily Cook DPM, MPH, Philip Basile, DPM

Foot and Ankle Specialist: Foot Ankle Spec April 2011 vol. 4 no. 2, 106-111

This is a case report using a new technique designed to allow passage of a screw through a joint while simultaneously preserving the joint cartilage. A 58-year-old woman with diabetes with midfoot Charcot neuro-arthropathy underwent reconstruction, which included a medial column rodding. A headless 8.0-mm screw was inserted into the first metatarsal head coursing along the entire medial column after temporary removal of a portion of the osteochondral surface. This allowed the screw to be positioned perpendicular to the medial column joints. Serial radiographs were collected to evaluate alignment, stability, and osteochondral graft incorporation. The patient showed preservation of joint motion and function with complete osteochondral graft incorporation without evidence of joint degeneration or pain after 45 months of follow-up. This is the first study to present the use of a local osteochondral graft to allow passage of a large diameter screw in the foot. Although graft incorporation was complete, the situation regarding joint preservation remains unclear, but midterm follow-up shows promise.

Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level IV, retrospective case study